<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3.6 has removed support for XPCOM plugins!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/</link>
	<description>Dumping our corps so you don&#039;t have to</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 01:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefano</title>
		<link>http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/comment-page-1/#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/#comment-628</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s not userfriendly to develop addon&#039;s in xpcom- .xpt since it lacks transparency to examine the compiled code for the normal user. its been used to sniff data or make (il)legal) requests against privacy policy. but you old farts maybe just not capable to learn something to do a new way. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s not userfriendly to develop addon&#8217;s in xpcom- .xpt since it lacks transparency to examine the compiled code for the normal user. its been used to sniff data or make (il)legal) requests against privacy policy. but you old farts maybe just not capable to learn something to do a new way. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dsliu</title>
		<link>http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Dsliu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/#comment-493</guid>
		<description>&quot; they just removed support for scripting with XPCOM (xpt files).&quot;, I don&#039;t agree with it. Because I develop xpcom and it works well with firefox 3.6.16. It still can be access in my javascript code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; they just removed support for scripting with XPCOM (xpt files).&#8221;, I don&#8217;t agree with it. Because I develop xpcom and it works well with firefox 3.6.16. It still can be access in my javascript code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taxilian</title>
		<link>http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>taxilian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/#comment-305</guid>
		<description>Rather than answer this here, let me point you to a better spot to post this:  please try the firebreath-dev mailing list here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.google.com/group/firebreath-dev/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://groups.google.com/group/firebreath-dev/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(I will give you the spoiler that you&#039;re probably not registering the methods/properties in the constructor, though)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than answer this here, let me point you to a better spot to post this:  please try the firebreath-dev mailing list here: <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/firebreath-dev/" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/firebreath-dev/</a></p>
<p>(I will give you the spoiler that you&#39;re probably not registering the methods/properties in the constructor, though)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tuanpham</title>
		<link>http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>tuanpham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/#comment-304</guid>
		<description>Hi, Couldn&#039;t find a better spot to post this but I&#039;ve been experimenting with firebreath, with the end goal of an NPAPI Scriptable plugin for FF. I&#039;ve got the environment setup and building properly I believe, can register the produced dll, but when I try to use it via javascript, the methods/properties don&#039;t work. The only call that does seem to work is &quot;.valid&quot;. I added some trace statements in the control so I can see it is instantiated, but none of the methods seem to be registered properly. This is on Windows, VS2008, and IE 7/FF3.5. Can you point me in any directions that I could look at to figure out the source of my problem? Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Couldn&#39;t find a better spot to post this but I&#39;ve been experimenting with firebreath, with the end goal of an NPAPI Scriptable plugin for FF. I&#39;ve got the environment setup and building properly I believe, can register the produced dll, but when I try to use it via javascript, the methods/properties don&#39;t work. The only call that does seem to work is &#8220;.valid&#8221;. I added some trace statements in the control so I can see it is instantiated, but none of the methods seem to be registered properly. This is on Windows, VS2008, and IE 7/FF3.5. Can you point me in any directions that I could look at to figure out the source of my problem? Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taxilian</title>
		<link>http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>taxilian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/#comment-176</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting that!  Good to see the specifics of the change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting that!  Good to see the specifics of the change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taxilian</title>
		<link>http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/comment-page-1/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>taxilian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/#comment-253</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting that!  Good to see the specifics of the change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting that!  Good to see the specifics of the change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navaid</title>
		<link>http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Navaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Bug 488042 - disable XPCOM plugin loading &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488042&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bug 488042 &#8211; disable XPCOM plugin loading <br /><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488042" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navaid</title>
		<link>http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Navaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/#comment-252</guid>
		<description>Bug 488042 - disable XPCOM plugin loading &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488042&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bug 488042 &#8211; disable XPCOM plugin loading <br /><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488042" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taxilian</title>
		<link>http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>taxilian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/#comment-174</guid>
		<description>As of yet, it does not; I simply haven&#039;t needed them.  there is an individual who is working on a model to add them, however, and you&#039;d be a welcome addition to his efforts, should you care to join us.  It is definitely on the list of features that need to be added.  Inquire on the firebreath-dev list for more info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of yet, it does not; I simply haven&#39;t needed them.  there is an individual who is working on a model to add them, however, and you&#39;d be a welcome addition to his efforts, should you care to join us.  It is definitely on the list of features that need to be added.  Inquire on the firebreath-dev list for more info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taxilian</title>
		<link>http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>taxilian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://colonelpanic.net/2010/01/firefox-3-6-has-removed-support-for-xpcom-plugins/#comment-259</guid>
		<description>As of yet, it does not; I simply haven&#039;t needed them.  there is an individual who is working on a model to add them, however, and you&#039;d be a welcome addition to his efforts, should you care to join us.  It is definitely on the list of features that need to be added.  Inquire on the firebreath-dev list for more info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of yet, it does not; I simply haven&#39;t needed them.  there is an individual who is working on a model to add them, however, and you&#39;d be a welcome addition to his efforts, should you care to join us.  It is definitely on the list of features that need to be added.  Inquire on the firebreath-dev list for more info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

